Who it's for

The people who carry the risk when it's wrong.

Every sanction in the reported AI-hallucination cases landed on a signature, not on software. Four groups have exposure to that signature — and buy Ratia audits for reasons that differ.

Carriers Malpractice underwriters buy the report to price the risk of firms that run on AI — and to know which tools they're comfortable underwriting. An independent grounding measurement gives an actuary something to model that a vendor's self-reported accuracy number cannot.
Firms Firms buy the report before choosing a tool — which one is actually grounded on their jurisdiction, and what each one gets wrong. Or after they've deployed one, to know what it's been doing on real matters before a court finds out.
Vendors Vendors commission an audit to prove their tool is grounded — with an independent number instead of their own claim. The strongest tools have the most to gain from being measured; the weakest have the most to lose from being avoided by measured buyers.
Attorneys The attorney whose name is on the filing. Every sanction landed on a signature, not on software. Individual lawyers commission private audits to know what their tool actually does before they sign.

Not who it's for

Ratia doesn't tell you whether to buy a tool.

Ratia measures grounding. What a firm should do about the measurement — how to weigh it against price, workflow, integration, and other buying criteria — is the firm's decision, with the firm's counsel. The audit produces a number and a failure profile. The buying decision is yours.

See the audits · Read the methodology

Early access

Get in the queue.

On the list. You'll see the Minnesota results first.

Something went wrong — please try again.

Tell us which audience you're in when you sign up — helps us route.